<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Julie and Julia: saucy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elsa</title>
		<link>http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbebekin.com/?p=3379#comment-4008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll also point out that Roger Ebert, whose opinions I often find instructive even when I disagree, has &lt;a href=&quot;http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090805/REVIEWS/908069991/1023&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a most ridiculous complaint&lt;/a&gt; to make about &lt;em&gt;Julie and Julia&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;“Julie &amp; Julia” is not lacking in entertainment value, especially with the Streep performance. But if the men had been portrayed as more high-spirited, it might have taken on intriguing dimensions. Both husbands are, frankly, a little boring: They’ve been assigned their supporting roles in their marriages and are reluctant to question the singlemindedness of their wives.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Dude. If this were a film about two male chefs (or, more accurately, a male chef and a male blogger chef-wannabe), and their wives merely stood around in the background making encouraging noises, no one would blink, because &lt;em&gt;female character as male support network&lt;/em&gt; is simply business as usual in Hollywood movies. 

Indeed, this may be part of what I found so inviting about &lt;em&gt;Julie and Julia&lt;/em&gt;: it is such a relief to see two female characters simply following their passions. Though both characters face uniquely female hurdles (especially Child), the film treats them as full, well-rounded &lt;em&gt;humans&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll also point out that Roger Ebert, whose opinions I often find instructive even when I disagree, has <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090805/REVIEWS/908069991/1023" rel="nofollow">a most ridiculous complaint</a> to make about <em>Julie and Julia</em>:<br />
<blockquote>“Julie &amp; Julia” is not lacking in entertainment value, especially with the Streep performance. But if the men had been portrayed as more high-spirited, it might have taken on intriguing dimensions. Both husbands are, frankly, a little boring: They’ve been assigned their supporting roles in their marriages and are reluctant to question the singlemindedness of their wives.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude. If this were a film about two male chefs (or, more accurately, a male chef and a male blogger chef-wannabe), and their wives merely stood around in the background making encouraging noises, no one would blink, because <em>female character as male support network</em> is simply business as usual in Hollywood movies. </p>
<p>Indeed, this may be part of what I found so inviting about <em>Julie and Julia</em>: it is such a relief to see two female characters simply following their passions. Though both characters face uniquely female hurdles (especially Child), the film treats them as full, well-rounded <em>humans</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elsa</title>
		<link>http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbebekin.com/?p=3379#comment-4007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the film, I wanted to whip hot hollandaise at Julie&#039;s pinched-up little moue of irritation, but I admit that Amy Adams is one of the very few actresses who could make this character a bit sympathetic. 

Streep is just delightful: the body language, the voice, the bonhomie brimming over throughout the film. She&#039;s clearly playing Julia as cultural touchstone, not Julia as biographical person, but it works. The chemistry and ease between Tucci and Streep makes the whole film work. 

I was &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; eagerly awaiting this; I never liked Powell&#039;s blog, her voice, her persona, and I was a trifle disgusted that Julia Child&#039;s memoir pic got tangled up with Powell&#039;s blog-to-book. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://videoportjones.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Fella&lt;/a&gt; brought home a preview copy in case I wanted to write a review. 

On watching, I was startled at how effectively the narrative faced Powell&#039;s shallow and self-centered character*, only diffusing it a little with twinkle and charm. Frankly, I wasn&#039;t sure Nora Ephron would know that this simpering, blabbering person was unlikeable.

*There&#039;s a great conversation an hour or so in: Julie Powell&#039;s dear friend announces that she&#039;s broken up with her boyfriend, and Powell&#039;s response is [paraphrased] &lt;em&gt;Oh, that&#039;s awful, I didn&#039;t even ask! I &lt;b&gt;am&lt;/b&gt; self-centered!&lt;/em&gt; and then she&#039;s off again talking about her own problems. Even as she agonizes over being self-absorbed and needy, she is demonstrating it. I just wanted to hit with a saucier. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout the film, I wanted to whip hot hollandaise at Julie&#8217;s pinched-up little moue of irritation, but I admit that Amy Adams is one of the very few actresses who could make this character a bit sympathetic. </p>
<p>Streep is just delightful: the body language, the voice, the bonhomie brimming over throughout the film. She&#8217;s clearly playing Julia as cultural touchstone, not Julia as biographical person, but it works. The chemistry and ease between Tucci and Streep makes the whole film work. </p>
<p>I was <em>not</em> eagerly awaiting this; I never liked Powell&#8217;s blog, her voice, her persona, and I was a trifle disgusted that Julia Child&#8217;s memoir pic got tangled up with Powell&#8217;s blog-to-book. But <a href="http://videoportjones.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">The Fella</a> brought home a preview copy in case I wanted to write a review. </p>
<p>On watching, I was startled at how effectively the narrative faced Powell&#8217;s shallow and self-centered character*, only diffusing it a little with twinkle and charm. Frankly, I wasn&#8217;t sure Nora Ephron would know that this simpering, blabbering person was unlikeable.</p>
<p>*There&#8217;s a great conversation an hour or so in: Julie Powell&#8217;s dear friend announces that she&#8217;s broken up with her boyfriend, and Powell&#8217;s response is [paraphrased] <em>Oh, that&#8217;s awful, I didn&#8217;t even ask! I <b>am</b> self-centered!</em> and then she&#8217;s off again talking about her own problems. Even as she agonizes over being self-absorbed and needy, she is demonstrating it. I just wanted to hit with a saucier. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgazzetti</title>
		<link>http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sgazzetti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbebekin.com/?p=3379#comment-4006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been looking forward to seeing this and appreciate the news of its release date. Don&#039;t appreciate the &#039;spunky&#039; quite as much, but whatyagonnado?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking forward to seeing this and appreciate the news of its release date. Don&#8217;t appreciate the &#8216;spunky&#8217; quite as much, but whatyagonnado?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaoo</title>
		<link>http://macbebekin.com/2009/12/04/julie-and-julia-saucy/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gaoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbebekin.com/?p=3379#comment-4005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved everything about this movie even, as you rightly point out, Julie&#039;s whiny self-indulgence. But the dearest, truesest-ringing, most surprising, and supremely well-acted part was the demonstration of love between Julia and Paul. Had me sniffling through the whole thing.Naturally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved everything about this movie even, as you rightly point out, Julie&#8217;s whiny self-indulgence. But the dearest, truesest-ringing, most surprising, and supremely well-acted part was the demonstration of love between Julia and Paul. Had me sniffling through the whole thing.Naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

